GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID M10-1B

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

GRID M10-1B

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

GTX 1650

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • +423.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $2,351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 8678.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than GRID M10-1B: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID M10-1B is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.

GRID M10-1B

2015

Why buy it

  • Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,504 vs 7,869).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 1577.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than GRID M10-1B?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 1,504 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GRID M10-1B is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015, 423.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 512 MB, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $2,351 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and you are getting 423.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 8678.6%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is GRID M10-1B still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GRID M10-1B is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,500 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650GRID M10-1B
1080p
low94 FPS68 FPS
medium83 FPS54 FPS
high70 FPS45 FPS
ultra58 FPS34 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS51 FPS
medium74 FPS41 FPS
high60 FPS34 FPS
ultra50 FPS25 FPS
4K
low41 FPS28 FPS
medium39 FPS26 FPS
high27 FPS17 FPS
ultra24 FPS15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650GRID M10-1B
1080p
low136 FPS68 FPS
medium113 FPS54 FPS
high94 FPS45 FPS
ultra71 FPS34 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS51 FPS
medium62 FPS41 FPS
high44 FPS34 FPS
ultra35 FPS25 FPS
4K
low36 FPS34 FPS
medium27 FPS27 FPS
high21 FPS23 FPS
ultra15 FPS17 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1650GRID M10-1B
1080p
low323 FPS68 FPS
medium283 FPS54 FPS
high205 FPS45 FPS
ultra169 FPS34 FPS
1440p
low225 FPS51 FPS
medium202 FPS41 FPS
high151 FPS34 FPS
ultra117 FPS25 FPS
4K
low130 FPS34 FPS
medium117 FPS27 FPS
high79 FPS23 FPS
ultra50 FPS17 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1650GRID M10-1B
1080p
low261 FPS68 FPS
medium211 FPS54 FPS
high191 FPS45 FPS
ultra166 FPS34 FPS
1440p
low201 FPS51 FPS
medium158 FPS41 FPS
high135 FPS34 FPS
ultra113 FPS25 FPS
4K
low99 FPS34 FPS
medium74 FPS27 FPS
high65 FPS23 FPS
ultra51 FPS17 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GRID M10-1B

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-1B

The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GRID M10-1B's 1,504 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 423.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GRID M10-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1B). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID M10-1B
G3D Mark Score
7,869+423%
1,504
Architecture
Turing
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896
2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+62%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+41%
1178 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
56
128+129%
L1 Cache
896 KB+17%
768 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID M10-1B relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID M10-1B
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-1B has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1B) — the GRID M10-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID M10-1B
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1B). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID M10-1B
DirectX
12
12_1
Max Displays
3
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GRID M10-1B's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GRID M10-1B). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID M10-1B
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+1466%
6.7
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GRID M10-1B launched at $2500. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 94% less ($2351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.6 (GRID M10-1B) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 8700% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GRID M10-1B
MSRP
$149-94%
$2500
Performance per Dollar
52.8+8700%
0.6
Codename
TU117
GM204
Release
April 23 2019
August 30 2015
Ranking
#323
#525