
GeForce GTX 1650

GRID M10-4Q
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID M10-4Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID M10-4Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID M10-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+164.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,656 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4876.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅GRID M10-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
GRID M10-4Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,977 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1782.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,805 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,805 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID M10-4Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GRID M10-4Q
The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GRID M10-4Q's 2,977 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 164.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GRID M10-4Q uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 640 (GRID M10-4Q). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+164% | 2,977 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+40% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+78% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+27% | 1306 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+180% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M10-4Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-4Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-4Q. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) — the GRID M10-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GRID M10-4Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GRID M10-4Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+695% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GRID M10-4Q launched at $2805. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 94.7% cheaper ($2656 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 4700% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-95% | $2805 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+4700% | 1.1 |
| Codename | TU117 | GM107 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #323 | #622 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















