GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID M40

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID M40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID M40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+214.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2012.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅GRID M40 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

GRID M40

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,500 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
571.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 214.8% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 2,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2012.5% (52.8 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID M40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GRID M40

The GRID M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GRID M40's 2,500 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 214.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GRID M40 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (GRID M40). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.7933 TFLOPS (GRID M40). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID M40
G3D Mark Score	7,869+215%	2,500
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+276%	0.7933 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+67%	1000 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	896 KB+367%	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M40 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID M40
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M40 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GRID M40. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (GRID M40) — the GRID M40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID M40
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GRID M40's 50W — a 40% difference. The GRID M40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GRID M40). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID M40
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+110%	50.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GRID M40 launched at $1000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 85.1% cheaper ($851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.5 (GRID M40) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2012% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID M40
MSRP	$149-85%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	52.8+2012%	2.5
Codename	TU117	GM107
Release	April 23 2019	May 18 2016
Ranking	#323	#742

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search GRID M40 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.