GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
Intel

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 21.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 34.2% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 5,862), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Intel Arc Pro A30M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Intel Arc Pro A30M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 5,862 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 34.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Intel Arc Pro A30M
G3D Mark Score
7,869+34%
5,862
Architecture
Turing
Generation 12.7
Process Node
12 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
896
1024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS+37%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2000 MHz+20%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
64+14%
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro A30M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Intel Arc Pro A30M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and System on the Intel Arc Pro A30M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Intel Arc Pro A30M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 40% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Intel Arc Pro A30M
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9
117.2+12%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A30M (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Intel Arc Pro A30M
MSRP
$149
Codename
TU117
DG2-128
Release
April 23 2019
August 8 2022
Ranking
#323
#402

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.