GeForce GTX 1650
Intel UHD Graphics P630
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+325.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 185.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 18.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Intel UHD Graphics P630
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,848 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Intel UHD Graphics P630
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Intel UHD Graphics P630's 1,848 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 325.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+326% | 1,848 |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 896+367% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+548% | 0.4608 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+39% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+967% | 3 |
| TMUs | 56+133% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and System on the Intel UHD Graphics P630.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Gen 9.5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | Gen 9.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P630's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 123.2+17% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics P630 was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 18.5 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 185.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $100-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+185% | 18.5 |
| Codename | TU117 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 24 2018 |
| Ranking | #323 | #640 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel UHD Graphics P630
