GeForce GTX 1650
Intel UHD Graphics P750
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+371.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 374.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics P750 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
- ❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.
Intel UHD Graphics P750
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,669 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌0.7% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Intel UHD Graphics P750
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 1,669 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 371.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+371% | 1,669 |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 896+250% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+348% | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+28% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and System on the Intel UHD Graphics P750.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs QuickSync.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 111.3+6% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 0.7% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.1 (Intel UHD Graphics P750) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 375.7% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics P750 (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+376% | 11.1 |
| Codename | TU117 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | 2021 |
| Ranking | #323 | #717 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel UHD Graphics P750
