GeForce GTX 1650
Iris Plus Graphics
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Plus Graphics Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Plus Graphics FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Plus Graphics: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+339.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 195.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 17.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
- ❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.
Iris Plus Graphics
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,789 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Plus Graphics Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 1,789 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 339.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+340% | 1,789 |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+75% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+191% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+67% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs QuickSync.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 119.3+14% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 195% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $100-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+195% | 17.9 |
| Codename | TU117 | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #323 | #714 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Iris Plus Graphics
