GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz

Popular choices:

••••GTX 1650•••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB 75

7,869

+293.4%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Shared System RAM 12

2,000

0.0%

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+293.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU): it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌525% higher power demand at 75W vs 12W.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 12W instead of 75W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,000 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

2019

Why buy it

✅+293.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU): it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Draws 12W instead of 75W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌525% higher power demand at 75W vs 12W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,000 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 2,000 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 293.4% more raw performance headroom and more VRAM at 4 GB instead of Unknown. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $149 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 293.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1080p
low	94 FPS	78 FPS
medium	83 FPS	69 FPS
high	70 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	31 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	65 FPS
medium	74 FPS	54 FPS
high	60 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	22 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	24 FPS
medium	39 FPS	23 FPS
high	27 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1080p
low	136 FPS	85 FPS
medium	113 FPS	57 FPS
high	94 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	27 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	57 FPS
medium	62 FPS	33 FPS
high	44 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	19 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	27 FPS
medium	27 FPS	18 FPS
high	21 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	10 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1080p
low	323 FPS	90 FPS
medium	283 FPS	72 FPS
high	205 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	68 FPS
medium	202 FPS	54 FPS
high	151 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	45 FPS
medium	117 FPS	36 FPS
high	79 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1080p
low	261 FPS	90 FPS
medium	211 FPS	72 FPS
high	191 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	68 FPS
medium	158 FPS	54 FPS
high	135 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	45 FPS
medium	74 FPS	36 FPS
high	65 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)'s 2,000 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 293.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
G3D Mark Score	7,869+293%	2,000
Architecture	Turing	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node	12 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	896+1300%	64
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+51%	1100 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	QuickSync
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	QuickSync
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)'s 12W — a 144.8% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
TDP	75W	12W-84%
Recommended PSU	300W	1W-100%
Power Connector	None	Integrated
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85
Perf/Watt	104.9	166.7+59%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 100+% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value.