Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+137.7%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Shared System RAM 30
3,311
0.0%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+137.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 219% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,311 vs 7,869).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    34.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 137.7% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 3,311), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 219% (52.8 vs 16.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 3,311 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 137.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
7,869+138%
3,311
Architecture
Turing
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
12 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
896+833%
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
QuickSync
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
300W
1W-100%
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
229mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
—
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
104.9
110.4+5%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 25.5% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 16.6 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 218.1% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
$149-26%
$200
Performance per Dollar
52.8+218%
16.6
Codename
TU117
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
April 23 2019
August 15 2020
Ranking
#323
#493
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch Iris Xe Graphics G7 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.