GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Popular choices:

••••GTX 1650•••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB 75

7,869

+189.8%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Shared System RAM 28

2,715

0.0%

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+189.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌167.9% higher power demand at 75W vs 28W.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 75W, a 47W reduction.
✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,715 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

2020

Why buy it

✅+189.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 75W, a 47W reduction.
✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌167.9% higher power demand at 75W vs 28W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,715 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 2,715 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a 2020 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 189.8% more raw performance headroom and more VRAM at 4 GB instead of Unknown. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $149 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 189.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the newer 2020 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (28W vs 75W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (28W vs 75W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1650. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1650 currently gives you 189.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
1080p
low	94 FPS	78 FPS
medium	83 FPS	69 FPS
high	70 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	31 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	65 FPS
medium	74 FPS	57 FPS
high	60 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	23 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	24 FPS
medium	39 FPS	23 FPS
high	27 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
1080p
low	136 FPS	86 FPS
medium	113 FPS	58 FPS
high	94 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	27 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	58 FPS
medium	62 FPS	34 FPS
high	44 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	19 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	28 FPS
medium	27 FPS	18 FPS
high	21 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
1080p
low	323 FPS	122 FPS
medium	283 FPS	98 FPS
high	205 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	92 FPS
medium	202 FPS	73 FPS
high	151 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	46 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	61 FPS
medium	117 FPS	49 FPS
high	79 FPS	41 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
1080p
low	261 FPS	122 FPS
medium	211 FPS	98 FPS
high	191 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	92 FPS
medium	158 FPS	73 FPS
high	135 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	46 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	61 FPS
medium	74 FPS	48 FPS
high	65 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs's 2,715 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 189.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
G3D Mark Score	7,869+190%	2,715
Architecture	Turing	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node	12 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	896+1020%	80
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+23%	1350 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs's 28W — a 91.3% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
TDP	75W	28W-63%
Recommended PSU	300W	0W-100%
Power Connector	None	None
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85
Perf/Watt	104.9+8%	97.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs costs 100+% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).