GeForce GTX 1650 vs L2

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs L2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs L2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+43.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1832% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

L2

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 7,869).
❌
1242.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 43.9% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 5,467), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

L2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 92 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1832% (52.8 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, L2 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs L2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

L2

The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the L2's 5,467 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 43.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2520 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
G3D Mark Score	7,869+44%	5,467
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	11776+1214%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	59.35 TFLOPS+1889%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2520 MHz+51%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	56	368+557%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	11.5 MB+1207%
L2 Cache	1 MB	96 MB+9500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The L2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the L2. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	96 MB+9500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
DirectX	12	12_2
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the L2's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
TDP	75W-73%	275W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+427%	19.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the L2 launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 92.5% cheaper ($1851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.7 (L2) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1855.6% better value. The newer card here is L2 (2023 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	L2
MSRP	$149-93%	$2000
Performance per Dollar	52.8+1856%	2.7
Codename	TU117	AD102
Release	April 23 2019	November 16 2023
Ranking	#323	#189

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search L2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.