GeForce GTX 1650
L4
GeForce GTX 1650 vs L4 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs L4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 vs L4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,196 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1119.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 10,153).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌35.5% longer card at 229mm vs 169mm.
L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅+29% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 229mm, a 60mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌1473.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,345 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,345 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs L4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
L4
The L4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 72W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the L4's 10,153 — the L4 leads by 29%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the L4 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7,424 (L4). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 30.29 TFLOPS (L4). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 10,153+29% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 7424+729% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 30.29 TFLOPS+915% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2040 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 56 | 240+329% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 7.5 MB+752% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The L4 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the L4 carries 8 GB. L4 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the L4. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48 MB (L4) — the L4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (L4). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (L4). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC (4x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (L4).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC (4x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the L4's 72W — a 4.1% difference. The L4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (L4). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 169mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 72W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 169mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 141.0+34% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the L4 launched at $2345. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 93.6% cheaper ($2196 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.3 (L4) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1127.9% better value. The newer card here is L4 (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-94% | $2345 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+1128% | 4.3 |
| Codename | TU117 | AD104 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #323 | #259 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and L4
