
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Maxwell GPU Surface Book
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+137.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 139.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 22.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Maxwell GPU Surface Book: it remains the more sensible modern option while Maxwell GPU Surface Book is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,311 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.7% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Maxwell GPU Surface Book
2015Why buy it
- ✅+137.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 139.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 22.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Maxwell GPU Surface Book: it remains the more sensible modern option while Maxwell GPU Surface Book is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,311 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.7% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Maxwell GPU Surface Book?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Maxwell GPU Surface Book still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 11 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 37 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Maxwell GPU Surface Book

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book
Maxwell GPU Surface Book
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Maxwell GPU Surface Book's 3,311 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 137.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+138% | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+133% | 384 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+68% | 993 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (11_0) (Maxwell GPU Surface Book). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (Maxwell GPU Surface Book). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | PureVideo VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Maxwell GPU Surface Book's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Maxwell GPU Surface Book). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 110.4+5% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book launched at $150. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 0.7% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 22.1 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 138.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+139% | 22.1 |
| Codename | TU117 | Surface Book |
| Release | April 23 2019 | October 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #323 | #779 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















