GeForce GTX 1650
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+124.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 126.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,500 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌0.7% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)'s 3,500 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 124.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+125% | 3,500 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+133% | 384 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+68% | 993 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (11_0) (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)'s 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 116.7+11% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 0.7% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 23.3 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 126.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+127% | 23.3 |
| Codename | TU117 | Surface Book |
| Release | April 23 2019 | October 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #323 | #782 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
