GeForce GTX 1650 vs MOBILITY RADEON X1800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs MOBILITY RADEON X1800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs MOBILITY RADEON X1800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+5953.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16109.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
✅MOBILITY RADEON X1800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (130 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
167.8% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5953.1% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 130), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $250 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 16109.2% (52.8 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs MOBILITY RADEON X1800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

The MOBILITY RADEON X1800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X1800's 130 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 5953.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the MOBILITY RADEON X1800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X1800). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X1800).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X1800
G3D Mark Score	7,869+5953%	130
Architecture	Turing	TeraScale 2
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+12%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+166%	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	896 KB+1020%	80 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON X1800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X1800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X1800 carries 256 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X1800. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON X1800) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X1800
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.0c (MOBILITY RADEON X1800). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X1800
DirectX	12+33%	9.0c
OpenGL	4.6+130%	2.0
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X1800's 50W — a 40% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X1800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X1800). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X1800
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+3935%	2.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the MOBILITY RADEON X1800 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 62.7% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON X1800) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 17500% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	MOBILITY RADEON X1800
MSRP	$149-63%	$399
Performance per Dollar	52.8+17500%	0.3
Codename	TU117	Broadway
Release	April 23 2019	January 7 2010
Ranking	#323	#846

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search MOBILITY RADEON X1800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.