GeForce GTX 1650
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
GeForce GTX 1650 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+13015% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 4213% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
- ❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (60 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 60 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 13015%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL uses TeraScale, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+13015% | 60 |
| Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+12% | 800 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+239% | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+460% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9_0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+33% | 9_0b |
| OpenGL | 4.6+119% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+5145% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL was 67.1% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 4300% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $49-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+4300% | 1.2 |
| Codename | TU117 | M98 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #323 | #818 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
