Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S30

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

Moore Threads MTT S30

Core: 1800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S30 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+1256.7%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Moore Threads MTT S30
0.5 GB 255
580
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 230
brand logoGeForce GT 620
brand logoRadeon HD 7560D
brand logoGeForce GTS 240
brand logoRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+1256.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Delivers 400.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
  • ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅Moore Threads MTT S30 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 255W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.

Moore Threads MTT S30

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $94 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (580 vs 7,869).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌240% higher power demand at 255W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1256.7% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 580), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2019 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $94 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $55, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 400.8% (52.8 vs 10.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S30 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Moore Threads MTT S30

The Moore Threads MTT S30 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 580 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Moore Threads MTT S30's 580 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1256.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Moore Threads MTT S30 uses MUSA, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S30). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S30).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S30
G3D Mark Score
7,869+1257%
580
Architecture
Turing
MUSA
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
896
4096+357%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS+394%
ROPs
32
256+700%
TMUs
56
256+357%
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Moore Threads MTT S30 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S30
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S30 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S30. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S30) — the Moore Threads MTT S30 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S30
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S30
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MUSA Gen1 (Moore Threads MTT S30). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs MUSA Gen1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265 (Moore Threads MTT S30).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S30
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
MUSA Gen1
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
MUSA Gen1
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Moore Threads MTT S30's 255W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 250W (Moore Threads MTT S30). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S30
TDP
75W-71%
255W
Recommended PSU
300W
250W-17%
Power Connector
None
None
Length
229mm
145mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
—
Perf/Watt
104.9+4461%
2.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Moore Threads MTT S30 launched at $55. On MSRP, Moore Threads MTT S30 was 63.1% cheaper ($94 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.5 (Moore Threads MTT S30) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 402.9% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP
$149
$55-63%
Performance per Dollar
52.8+403%
10.5
Codename
TU117
Chunxiao
Release
April 23 2019
sem dados
Ranking
#323
#635
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch Moore Threads MTT S30 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.