Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S70

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

Moore Threads MTT S70

Core: 1600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S70 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+318.6%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Moore Threads MTT S70
0.5 GB 220
1,880
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 8750M
brand logoGeForce 930A
brand logoGeForce GTX 660M
brand logoRadeon R7 M380
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S70: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+318.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Costs $196 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 869.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
  • ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅Moore Threads MTT S70 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Moore Threads MTT S70

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,880 vs 7,869).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    131.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $345 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($345 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 318.6% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 1,880), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2019 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $196 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $345, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 869.2% (52.8 vs 5.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S70 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Moore Threads MTT S70

The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Moore Threads MTT S70's 1,880 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 318.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Moore Threads MTT S70 uses MUSA, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S70
G3D Mark Score
7,869+319%
1,880
Architecture
Turing
MUSA
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
896
3584+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
11.47 TFLOPS+284%
ROPs
32
224+600%
TMUs
56
224+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
3.5 MB+250%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Moore Threads MTT S70 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S70
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S70. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S70
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
3.5 MB+250%
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S70
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S70).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S70
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
MUSA Gen2
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
MUSA Gen2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Moore Threads MTT S70's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S70
TDP
75W-66%
220W
Recommended PSU
300W-50%
600W
Power Connector
None
1x 8-pin
Length
229mm
285mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
—
Perf/Watt
104.9+1134%
8.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 56.8% cheaper ($196 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 877.8% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Moore Threads MTT S70
MSRP
$149-57%
$345
Performance per Dollar
52.8+878%
5.4
Codename
TU117
Chunxiao
Release
April 23 2019
sem dados
Ranking
#323
#694
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch Moore Threads MTT S70 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.