GeForce GTX 1650 vs Moore Threads MTT S70

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Moore Threads MTT S70

Core: 1600 MHz

Popular choices:

••••GTX 1650•••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB 75

7,869

+318.6%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Moore Threads MTT S70

0.5 GB 220

1,880

0.0%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+318.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $196 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
✅Delivers 869.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Moore Threads MTT S70: it remains the more sensible modern option while Moore Threads MTT S70 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Moore Threads MTT S70

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,880 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
131.5% HIGHER MSRP
$345 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($345 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Moore Threads MTT S70

Why buy it

✅+318.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $196 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
✅Delivers 869.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Moore Threads MTT S70: it remains the more sensible modern option while Moore Threads MTT S70 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,880 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
131.5% HIGHER MSRP
$345 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($345 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Moore Threads MTT S70?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 1,880 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Moore Threads MTT S70 is a 0 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 0, 318.6% more raw performance headroom, and more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 512 MB. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $196 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $345 MSRP, and you are getting 318.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 869.2%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Moore Threads MTT S70 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Moore Threads MTT S70 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $345 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Moore Threads MTT S70 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Moore Threads MTT S70
1080p
low	94 FPS	85 FPS
medium	83 FPS	68 FPS
high	70 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	42 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	63 FPS
medium	74 FPS	51 FPS
high	60 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	42 FPS
medium	39 FPS	34 FPS
high	27 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	21 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Moore Threads MTT S70

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Moore Threads MTT S70
1080p
low	136 FPS	85 FPS
medium	113 FPS	68 FPS
high	94 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	42 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	63 FPS
medium	62 FPS	51 FPS
high	44 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	42 FPS
medium	27 FPS	34 FPS
high	21 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	21 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Moore Threads MTT S70

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Moore Threads MTT S70
1080p
low	323 FPS	85 FPS
medium	283 FPS	68 FPS
high	205 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	42 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	63 FPS
medium	202 FPS	51 FPS
high	151 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	42 FPS
medium	117 FPS	34 FPS
high	79 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	21 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Moore Threads MTT S70

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Moore Threads MTT S70
1080p
low	261 FPS	85 FPS
medium	211 FPS	68 FPS
high	191 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	42 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	63 FPS
medium	158 FPS	51 FPS
high	135 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	42 FPS
medium	74 FPS	34 FPS
high	65 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	21 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Moore Threads MTT S70

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Moore Threads MTT S70

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Moore Threads MTT S70

The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Moore Threads MTT S70's 1,880 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 318.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Moore Threads MTT S70 uses MUSA, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Moore Threads MTT S70
G3D Mark Score	7,869+319%	1,880
Architecture	Turing	MUSA
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896	3584+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	11.47 TFLOPS+284%
ROPs	32	224+600%
TMUs	56	224+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3.5 MB+250%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Moore Threads MTT S70 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Moore Threads MTT S70
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Moore Threads MTT S70
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	3.5 MB+250%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Moore Threads MTT S70
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S70).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Moore Threads MTT S70
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	MUSA Gen2
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	MUSA Gen2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Moore Threads MTT S70's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Moore Threads MTT S70
TDP	75W-66%	220W
Recommended PSU	300W-50%	600W
Power Connector	None	1x 8-pin
Length	229mm	285mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+1134%	8.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 56.8% less ($196 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 877.8% better value.