
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Moore Threads MTT S80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+213.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 446.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Moore Threads MTT S80: it remains the more sensible modern option while Moore Threads MTT S80 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Moore Threads MTT S80
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,513 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌74.5% HIGHER MSRP$260 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($260 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Moore Threads MTT S80
Why buy it
- ✅+213.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 446.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Moore Threads MTT S80: it remains the more sensible modern option while Moore Threads MTT S80 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,513 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌74.5% HIGHER MSRP$260 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($260 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Moore Threads MTT S80?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Moore Threads MTT S80 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 28 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 28 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Moore Threads MTT S80

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Moore Threads MTT S80
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 2,513 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 213.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Moore Threads MTT S80 uses MUSA, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+213% | 2,513 |
| Architecture | Turing | MUSA |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 4096+357% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+394% |
| ROPs | 32 | 256+700% |
| TMUs | 56 | 256+357% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Moore Threads MTT S80 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 255W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-71% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+960% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 42.7% less ($111 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.7 (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 444.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-43% | $260 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+444% | 9.7 |
| Codename | TU117 | Chunxiao |
| Release | April 23 2019 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #323 | #635 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














