Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVS 310

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

NVS 310

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVS 310 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+2761.5%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
NVS 310
0.5 GB 68
275
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 120M
brand logoGeForce 8600 GS
brand logoGeForce GT 240M
brand logoGeForce 7800 GT
brand logoGeForce GTX 1630
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVS 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+2761.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 2953.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅NVS 310 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.

NVS 310

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (275 vs 7,869).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    6.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $159 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2761.5% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 275), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $159, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2953.5% (52.8 vs 1.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVS 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

NVS 310

The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the NVS 310's 275 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2761.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the NVS 310 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 512 (NVS 310). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 310). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 310
G3D Mark Score
7,869+2761%
275
Architecture
Turing
Maxwell
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896+75%
512 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+182%
1.058 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+61%
1033 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16 ×2
TMUs
56+75%
32 ×2
L1 Cache
896 KB+250%
256 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The NVS 310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 310
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 310 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the NVS 310.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 310
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 310). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 310
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Fermi NVENC (NVS 310). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (NVS 310).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 310
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Fermi NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
VP4
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the NVS 310's 68W — a 9.8% difference. The NVS 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (NVS 310). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 310
TDP
75W
68W-9%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
145mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+2523%
4.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the NVS 310 launched at $159. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 6.3% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.7 (NVS 310) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3005.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 310
MSRP
$149-6%
$159
Performance per Dollar
52.8+3006%
1.7
Codename
TU117
GM107
Release
April 23 2019
November 4 2015
Ranking
#323
#826
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch NVS 310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.