Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVS 510

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

NVS 510

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVS 510 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+1057.2%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
NVS 510
2 GB 68
680
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 625
brand logoGeForce 9800M GTX
brand logoGeForce GT 630M
brand logoGeForce GT 430
brand logoGeForce GTX 950
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVS 510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅+1057.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 3387.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅NVS 510 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌43.1% longer card at 229mm vs 160mm.

NVS 510

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Measures 160mm instead of 229mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (680 vs 7,869).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    201.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $449 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1057.2% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 680), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $449, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3387.2% (52.8 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVS 510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the NVS 510's 680 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1057.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the NVS 510 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 512 (NVS 510). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 510
G3D Mark Score
7,869+1057%
680
Architecture
Turing
Maxwell
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896+75%
512 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+182%
1.058 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+61%
1033 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16 ×2
TMUs
56+75%
32 ×2
L1 Cache
896 KB+250%
256 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The NVS 510 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 510
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 510 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the NVS 510.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 510
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 510). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 510
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 510
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
1st Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the NVS 510's 68W — a 9.8% difference. The NVS 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (NVS 510). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 510
TDP
75W
68W-9%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
160mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
65°C-7%
Perf/Watt
104.9+949%
10.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the NVS 510 launched at $449. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 66.8% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.5 (NVS 510) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3420% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650NVS 510
MSRP
$149-67%
$449
Performance per Dollar
52.8+3420%
1.5
Codename
TU117
GM107
Release
April 23 2019
November 4 2015
Ranking
#323
#826
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch NVS 510 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.