GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro

1999Core: 135 MHz
Similar parts

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 165.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 956.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Quadro is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro

1999

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 1999 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 571.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 165.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 57.4% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 5,000), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 220nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 1999. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 956.2% (52.8 vs 5.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

Quadro

The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro's 5,000 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 57.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 12 nm vs 220 nm.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Quadro
G3D Mark Score
7,869+57%
5,000
Architecture
Turing
Celsius
Process Node
12 nm
220 nm
ROPs
32+700%
4
TMUs
56+1300%
4

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Quadro
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the Quadro.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Quadro
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Quadro
Max Displays
3+200%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs MPEG-2 Acceleration. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Quadro
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
None
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
MPEG-2 Acceleration
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Quadro
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+57%
66.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro launched at $1000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 85.1% cheaper ($851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.0 (Quadro) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 956% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 1999).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Quadro
MSRP
$149-85%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
52.8+956%
5.0
Codename
TU117
NV10
Release
April 23 2019
1999
Ranking
#323
#900

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.