
GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro 7000
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro 7000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro 7000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro 7000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅24.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $14,350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $14,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21746.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $14,499 MSRP).
- ✅Quadro 7000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 204W, a 129W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quadro 7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌9630.9% HIGHER MSRP$14,499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($14,499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌172% higher power demand at 204W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro 7000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro 7000
The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro 7000's 3,505 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 124.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro 7000 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 512 (Quadro 7000). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+125% | 3,505 |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+75% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+124% | 1.3322 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 64+14% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 7000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 7000 carries 6 GB. Quadro 7000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the Quadro 7000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.75 MB (Quadro 7000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro 7000's 204W — a 92.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro 7000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 204W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+510% | 17.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro 7000 launched at $14499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 99% cheaper ($14350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.2 (Quadro 7000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 26300% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-99% | $14499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+26300% | 0.2 |
| Codename | TU117 | GF110 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 2 2012 |
| Ranking | #323 | #541 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















