G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+730.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11048% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro CX: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro CX is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (947 vs 7,869).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1241.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

✅+730.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11048% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro CX: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro CX is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (947 vs 7,869).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1241.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Quadro CX?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 947 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro CX is a 2008 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008, 730.9% more raw performance headroom, and a 12nm process instead of 55nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $1,850 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $1,999 MSRP, and you are getting 730.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 11048%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro CX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro CX is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,999 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro CX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro CX
1080p
low	94 FPS	13 FPS
medium	83 FPS	9 FPS
high	70 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	3 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	9 FPS
medium	74 FPS	5 FPS
high	60 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	4 FPS
medium	39 FPS	2 FPS
high	27 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro CX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro CX
1080p
low	136 FPS	30 FPS
medium	113 FPS	14 FPS
high	94 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	7 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	16 FPS
medium	62 FPS	7 FPS
high	44 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	5 FPS
medium	27 FPS	3 FPS
high	21 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro CX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro CX
1080p
low	323 FPS	43 FPS
medium	283 FPS	34 FPS
high	205 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	21 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	32 FPS
medium	202 FPS	26 FPS
high	151 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	16 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	21 FPS
medium	117 FPS	17 FPS
high	79 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro CX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro CX
1080p
low	261 FPS	43 FPS
medium	211 FPS	34 FPS
high	191 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	21 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	8 FPS
medium	158 FPS	6 FPS
high	135 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	5 FPS
medium	74 FPS	4 FPS
high	65 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro CX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro CX

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro CX's 947 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 730.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro CX
G3D Mark Score	7,869+731%	947
Architecture	Turing	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	896+367%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+545%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+33%	24
TMUs	56	64+14%
L2 Cache	1 MB+426%	0.19 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro CX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro CX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro CX
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+426%	0.19 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro CX
DirectX	12+8%	11.1 (10_0)
Vulkan	1.4	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (Quadro CX). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro CX).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro CX
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	None
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro CX
TDP	75W-50%	150W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80
Perf/Watt	104.9+1565%	6.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 92.5% less ($1850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 (Quadro CX) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 10460% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).