GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅549.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $2,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23329.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Quadro FX 4700 X2 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro FX 4700 X2

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1912.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 549.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1064.1% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 676), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,850 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 23329.5% (52.8 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro FX 4700 X2

The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro FX 4700 X2's 676 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1064.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 4700 X2
G3D Mark Score	7,869+1064%	676
Architecture	Turing	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	896+367%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+545%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+33%	24
TMUs	56	64+14%
L2 Cache	1 MB+426%	0.19 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 4700 X2
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4700 X2. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 4700 X2
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+426%	0.19 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 4700 X2's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 4700 X2
TDP	75W-50%	150W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+2231%	4.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 launched at $2999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 95% cheaper ($2850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 26300% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP	$149-95%	$2999
Performance per Dollar	52.8+26300%	0.2
Codename	TU117	GT200B
Release	April 23 2019	November 11 2008
Ranking	#323	#884

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 4700 X2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.