GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro FX 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro FX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro FX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅2222.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 13751.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 128 MB).
✅Quadro FX 560 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.

Quadro FX 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100.7% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2222.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 6802.6% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 114), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 13751.6% (52.8 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro FX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro FX 560's 114 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 6802.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro FX 560 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 240 (Quadro FX 560). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 560
G3D Mark Score	7,869+6803%	114
Architecture	Turing	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	896+273%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+380%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	80+43%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 560
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 560 carries 128 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 560) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 560
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+3100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 560). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 560
DirectX	12+33%	9_0c
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 560's 189W — a 86.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro FX 560). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 560
TDP	75W-60%	189W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+17383%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro FX 560 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 50.2% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 13100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 560
MSRP	$149-50%	$299
Performance per Dollar	52.8+13100%	0.4
Codename	TU117	GT200B
Release	April 23 2019	November 11 2008
Ranking	#323	#815

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.