G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro GP100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro GP100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2596.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Quadro GP100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 235W, a 160W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro GP100

2016

Why buy it

✅109.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
4598% HIGHER MSRP
$7,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌213.3% higher power demand at 235W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro GP100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 109.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 74.2% in PassMark G3D (13,710 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6,851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $7,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2596.5% (52.8 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro GP100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro GP100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro GP100

The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro GP100's 13,710 — the Quadro GP100 leads by 74.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1442 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GP100
G3D Mark Score	7,869	13,710+74%
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	896	3584+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	10.34 TFLOPS+247%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+15%	1442 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	224+300%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1.3 MB+48%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro GP100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GP100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 carries 16 GB. Quadro GP100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 700% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 4096-bit on the Quadro GP100. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Quadro GP100) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GP100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	1024 GB/s+700%
Bus Width	128-bit	4096-bit+3100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GP100
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GP100
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 4th gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 3rd gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 103.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GP100
TDP	75W-68%	235W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+80%	58.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 97.9% cheaper ($6851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2540% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro GP100
MSRP	$149-98%	$7000
Performance per Dollar	52.8+2540%	2.0
Codename	TU117	GP100
Release	April 23 2019	October 1 2016
Ranking	#323	#178

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Quadro GP100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.