GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro K620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅202.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 258% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro K620: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro K620 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅202.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 258% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro K620: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro K620 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Quadro K620?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1650 averages 202.3% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 2,213 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro K620 is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014, 255.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $1 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 202.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 255.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 258%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro K620 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro K620 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $150 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro K620 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K620
1080p
low	94 FPS	16 FPS
medium	83 FPS	10 FPS
high	70 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	3 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	7 FPS
medium	74 FPS	4 FPS
high	60 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	3 FPS
medium	39 FPS	2 FPS
high	27 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro K620

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K620
1080p
low	136 FPS	72 FPS
medium	113 FPS	45 FPS
high	94 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	21 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	21 FPS
medium	62 FPS	15 FPS
high	44 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	6 FPS
medium	27 FPS	4 FPS
high	21 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro K620

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K620
1080p
low	323 FPS	100 FPS
medium	283 FPS	80 FPS
high	205 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	75 FPS
medium	202 FPS	60 FPS
high	151 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	50 FPS
medium	117 FPS	40 FPS
high	79 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro K620

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K620
1080p
low	261 FPS	100 FPS
medium	211 FPS	80 FPS
high	191 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	75 FPS
medium	158 FPS	60 FPS
high	135 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	50 FPS
medium	74 FPS	40 FPS
high	65 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro K620

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro K620

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro K620's 2,213 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 255.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro K620 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (Quadro K620). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K620
G3D Mark Score	7,869+256%	2,213
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+246%	0.8632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+48%	1124 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	896 KB+367%	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K620 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K620
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K620 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Quadro K620) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K620
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro K620's 45W — a 50% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro K620). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K620
TDP	75W	45W-40%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+113%	49.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Quadro K620 launched at $150. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 0.7% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14.8 (Quadro K620) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 256.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).