GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro M3000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅32.4% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M3000M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M3000M is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quadro M3000M

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Quadro M3000M

2015

Why buy it

✅32.4% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M3000M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M3000M is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Quadro M3000M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1650 averages 32.4% more FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 5,574 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro M3000M is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015, 41.2% more raw performance headroom, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $149 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 32.4% more estimated average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data and 41.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro M3000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro M3000M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro M3000M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M3000M
1080p
low	94 FPS	82 FPS
medium	83 FPS	70 FPS
high	70 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	72 FPS
medium	74 FPS	62 FPS
high	60 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	29 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	25 FPS
medium	39 FPS	24 FPS
high	27 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro M3000M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M3000M
1080p
low	136 FPS	157 FPS
medium	113 FPS	125 FPS
high	94 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	109 FPS
medium	62 FPS	85 FPS
high	44 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	53 FPS
medium	27 FPS	44 FPS
high	21 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro M3000M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M3000M
1080p
low	323 FPS	251 FPS
medium	283 FPS	201 FPS
high	205 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	188 FPS
medium	202 FPS	150 FPS
high	151 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	125 FPS
medium	117 FPS	100 FPS
high	79 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	63 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro M3000M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M3000M
1080p
low	261 FPS	157 FPS
medium	211 FPS	128 FPS
high	191 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	114 FPS
medium	158 FPS	95 FPS
high	135 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	70 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	65 FPS
medium	74 FPS	52 FPS
high	65 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro M3000M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro M3000M

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro M3000M

The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro M3000M's 5,574 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 41.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro M3000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1 (Quadro M3000M). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M3000M
G3D Mark Score	7,869+41%	5,574
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	1,024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+39%	2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	896 KB+133%	384 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M3000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M3000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Quadro M3000M) — the Quadro M3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M3000M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M3000M
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Quadro M3000M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M3000M
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro M3000M's 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro M3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro M3000M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro M3000M
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+41%	74.3