G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 141.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 9,386).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌13.9% longer card at 229mm vs 201mm.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

✅+19.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Measures 201mm instead of 229mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
187.9% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P2200 instead at 9,386 vs 7,869, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $280 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $429, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 141.4% (52.8 vs 21.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro P2200's 9,386 — the Quadro P2200 leads by 19.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1493 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2200
G3D Mark Score	7,869	9,386+19%
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	896	1280+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	3.822 TFLOPS+28%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+12%	1493 MHz
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	56	80+43%
L1 Cache	896 KB+87%	480 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 carries 5 GB. Quadro P2200 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the Quadro P2200. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the Quadro P2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2200
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	5 GB+25%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB+25%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2200
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2200
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2200
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	201mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	125.1+19%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 65.3% cheaper ($280 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 21.9 (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 141.1% better value.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2200
MSRP	$149-65%	$429
Performance per Dollar	52.8+141%	21.9
Codename	TU117	GP106
Release	April 23 2019	June 10 2019
Ranking	#323	#281

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Quadro P2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.