G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+23.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $451 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 396.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Quadro P3000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro P3000

2016

Why buy it

✅46.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,384 vs 7,869).
❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
302.7% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 46.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1650 instead at 7,869 vs 6,384, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $451 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $600, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 396.4% (52.8 vs 10.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P3000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro P3000's 6,384 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 23.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,840 (Quadro P3000). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P3000
G3D Mark Score	7,869+23%	6,384
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	896	3840+329%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	12.63 TFLOPS+323%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+1%	1645 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	240+329%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1.4 MB+59%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P3000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P3000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3000 carries 6 GB. Quadro P3000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the Quadro P3000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P3000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P3000
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P3000
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P3000
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+311%	25.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 75.2% cheaper ($451 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.6 (Quadro P3000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 398.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P3000
MSRP	$149-75%	$600
Performance per Dollar	52.8+398%	10.6
Codename	TU117	GP102
Release	April 23 2019	October 1 2016
Ranking	#323	#141

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Quadro P3000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.