GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P520

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+286.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 289.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 13.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P520: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P520 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌316.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 18W.

Quadro P520

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 75W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,034 vs 7,869).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Quadro P520

2019

Why buy it

✅+286.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 289.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 13.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P520: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P520 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 75W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌316.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 18W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,034 vs 7,869).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Quadro P520?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 2,034 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro P520 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 286.9% more raw performance headroom and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $1 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 286.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 289.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro P520 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P520 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $150 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro P520 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P520
1080p
low	94 FPS	22 FPS
medium	83 FPS	15 FPS
high	70 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	6 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	11 FPS
medium	74 FPS	6 FPS
high	60 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	2 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	6 FPS
medium	39 FPS	3 FPS
high	27 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P520

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P520
1080p
low	136 FPS	78 FPS
medium	113 FPS	48 FPS
high	94 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	22 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	23 FPS
medium	62 FPS	17 FPS
high	44 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	7 FPS
medium	27 FPS	5 FPS
high	21 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P520

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P520
1080p
low	323 FPS	92 FPS
medium	283 FPS	73 FPS
high	205 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	46 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	69 FPS
medium	202 FPS	55 FPS
high	151 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	46 FPS
medium	117 FPS	37 FPS
high	79 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P520

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P520
1080p
low	261 FPS	92 FPS
medium	211 FPS	73 FPS
high	191 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	46 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	69 FPS
medium	158 FPS	55 FPS
high	135 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	46 FPS
medium	74 FPS	37 FPS
high	65 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P520

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro P520

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro P520

The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro P520's 2,034 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 286.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro P520 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (Quadro P520). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1493 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P520
G3D Mark Score	7,869+287%	2,034
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+160%	1.147 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+12%	1493 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	896 KB+522%	144 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P520 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P520
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro P520) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P520
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro P520's 18W — a 122.6% difference. The Quadro P520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro P520). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P520
TDP	75W	18W-76%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9	113.0+8%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Quadro P520 launched at $150. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 0.7% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 13.6 (Quadro P520) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 288.2% better value.