G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro RTX A6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro RTX A6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,500 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 977% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

✅243.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
3020.1% HIGHER MSRP
$4,649 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX A6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 243.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 189.7% in PassMark G3D (22,798 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX A6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 48 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 12nm, 84 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,500 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $4,649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 977% (52.8 vs 4.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, Quadro RTX A6000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro RTX A6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro RTX A6000

The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 22,798 — the Quadro RTX A6000 leads by 189.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1800 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX A6000
G3D Mark Score	7,869	22,798+190%
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	896	10752+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	38.71 TFLOPS+1197%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1800 MHz+8%
ROPs	32	112+250%
TMUs	56	336+500%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	10.5 MB+1093%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX A6000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 carries 48 GB. Quadro RTX A6000 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 500% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 384-bit on the Quadro RTX A6000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX A6000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	48 GB+1100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	768 GB/s+500%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX A6000
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX A6000
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX A6000
TDP	75W-75%	300W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	8-pin EPS
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85
Perf/Watt	104.9+38%	76.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 96.8% cheaper ($4500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 977.6% better value. The newer card here is Quadro RTX A6000 (2020 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP	$149-97%	$4649
Performance per Dollar	52.8+978%	4.9
Codename	TU117	GA102
Release	April 23 2019	October 5 2020
Ranking	#323	#54

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Quadro RTX A6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.