
GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro T1000
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro T1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro T1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅28.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 224.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
- ❌46.8% longer card at 229mm vs 156mm.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 229mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌168.5% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro T1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro T1000's 6,505 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 21%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+21% | 6,505 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+14% | 1455 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro T1000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the Quadro T1000.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 156mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 130.1+24% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 62.7% cheaper ($251 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 223.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-63% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+224% | 16.3 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU117 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #376 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















