
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅35.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 428.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌235.6% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Quadro T1000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅35.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 428.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌235.6% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Quadro T1000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro T1000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 51 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro T1000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro T1000 (móvel)'s 5,000 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 57.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+57% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+17% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+34% | 2.235 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+14% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56+17% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+17% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro T1000 (móvel)'s 50W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+5% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) launched at $500. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 70.2% less ($351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.0 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 428% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-70% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+428% | 10.0 |
| Codename | TU117 | TU117 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #374 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













