GeForce GTX 1650
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+12.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 88.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,000 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌67.8% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS's 7,000 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 12.4%. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+12% | 7,000 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1536+71% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+11% | 1500 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) — a 5.5% advantage for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 135 GB/s+5% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs ES 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+44% | ES 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Adreno VPU. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | Adreno VPU |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | Adreno VPU |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 40W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 175.0+67% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 40.4% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 88.6% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-40% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+89% | 28.0 |
| Codename | TU117 | — |
| Release | April 23 2019 | October 26 2023 |
| Ranking | #323 | #482 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
