GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon 740M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+158.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Radeon 740M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,045 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon 740M

2024

Why buy it

✅+158.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,045 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon 740M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 3,045 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 740M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 740M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $149 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 158.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon 740M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (45W vs 75W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 740M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon 740M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (45W vs 75W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1650. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1650 currently gives you 158.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon 740M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 740M
1080p
low	94 FPS	32 FPS
medium	83 FPS	22 FPS
high	70 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	8 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	23 FPS
medium	74 FPS	14 FPS
high	60 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	9 FPS
medium	39 FPS	6 FPS
high	27 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon 740M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 740M
1080p
low	136 FPS	77 FPS
medium	113 FPS	50 FPS
high	94 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	48 FPS
medium	62 FPS	25 FPS
high	44 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	23 FPS
medium	27 FPS	14 FPS
high	21 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	8 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon 740M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 740M
1080p
low	323 FPS	137 FPS
medium	283 FPS	110 FPS
high	205 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	69 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	103 FPS
medium	202 FPS	82 FPS
high	151 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	51 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	69 FPS
medium	117 FPS	55 FPS
high	79 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon 740M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 740M
1080p
low	261 FPS	137 FPS
medium	211 FPS	110 FPS
high	191 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	69 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	103 FPS
medium	158 FPS	82 FPS
high	135 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	51 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	69 FPS
medium	74 FPS	55 FPS
high	65 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon 740M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon 740M

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon 740M

The Radeon 740M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 4 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,045 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon 740M's 3,045 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 158.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon 740M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 (Radeon 740M). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon 740M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2800 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 740M
G3D Mark Score	7,869+158%	3,045
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	896+250%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+4%	2.867 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2800 MHz+68%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	56+250%	16
L1 Cache	896 KB+1300%	64 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 740M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 740M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 740M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon 740M) — the Radeon 740M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon 740M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon 740M's 45W — a 50% difference. The Radeon 740M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon 740M). Power connectors: None vs None.