GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 51655.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6866.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 157280% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 5), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 12nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 51655.8% (52.8 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 157280%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	7,869+157280%	5
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	896	1024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS+99%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2900 MHz+74%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	896 KB+250%	256 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+3100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON 9000
TDP	75W	15W-80%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+34867%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, RADEON 9000 was 67.1% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 52700% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON 9000
MSRP	$149	$49-67%
Performance per Dollar	52.8+52700%	0.1
Codename	TU117	Strix Point
Release	April 23 2019	July 15 2024
Ranking	#323	#312

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.