
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon E8870PCIe
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅272.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 292% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon E8870PCIe: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon E8870PCIe is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌102.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 37W.
Radeon E8870PCIe
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 75W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌67.8% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon E8870PCIe
2014Why buy it
- ✅272.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 292% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon E8870PCIe: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon E8870PCIe is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 75W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌102.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 37W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌67.8% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon E8870PCIe?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon E8870PCIe still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon E8870PCIe

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon E8870PCIe
Radeon E8870PCIe
The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 3,368 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 133.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon E8870PCIe uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8870PCIe). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 625 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+134% | 3,368 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+40% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+273% | 0.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+166% | 625 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+460% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon E8870PCIe relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E8870PCIe has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 37W — a 67.9% difference. The Radeon E8870PCIe is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 37W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+15% | 91.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon E8870PCIe launched at $250. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 40.4% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 13.5 (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 291.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-40% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+291% | 13.5 |
| Codename | TU117 | Venus |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 25 2014 |
| Ranking | #323 | #734 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













