GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon E8870PCIe

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon E8870PCIe

2014Core: 575 MHzBoost: 625 MHz

Popular choices:

GTX 1650

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 272.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $101 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 292% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon E8870PCIe: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon E8870PCIe is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 102.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 37W.

Radeon E8870PCIe

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 37W instead of 75W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 67.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon E8870PCIe?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1650 averages 272.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 3,368 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon E8870PCIe is a 2014 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014, 133.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $101 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and you are getting 272.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 133.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 292%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Radeon E8870PCIe still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon E8870PCIe is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $250 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon E8870PCIe
1080p
low94 FPS21 FPS
medium83 FPS12 FPS
high70 FPS8 FPS
ultra58 FPS4 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS10 FPS
medium74 FPS5 FPS
high60 FPS3 FPS
ultra50 FPS1 FPS
4K
low41 FPS4 FPS
medium39 FPS2 FPS
high27 FPS1 FPS
ultra24 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon E8870PCIe
1080p
low136 FPS36 FPS
medium113 FPS19 FPS
high94 FPS13 FPS
ultra71 FPS9 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS17 FPS
medium62 FPS9 FPS
high44 FPS6 FPS
ultra35 FPS5 FPS
4K
low36 FPS5 FPS
medium27 FPS3 FPS
high21 FPS2 FPS
ultra15 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon E8870PCIe
1080p
low323 FPS152 FPS
medium283 FPS121 FPS
high205 FPS93 FPS
ultra169 FPS76 FPS
1440p
low225 FPS114 FPS
medium202 FPS91 FPS
high151 FPS70 FPS
ultra117 FPS57 FPS
4K
low130 FPS76 FPS
medium117 FPS61 FPS
high79 FPS45 FPS
ultra50 FPS31 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon E8870PCIe
1080p
low261 FPS67 FPS
medium211 FPS52 FPS
high191 FPS36 FPS
ultra166 FPS28 FPS
1440p
low201 FPS9 FPS
medium158 FPS7 FPS
high135 FPS6 FPS
ultra113 FPS5 FPS
4K
low99 FPS6 FPS
medium74 FPS4 FPS
high65 FPS4 FPS
ultra51 FPS3 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon E8870PCIe

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon E8870PCIe

The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 3,368 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 133.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon E8870PCIe uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8870PCIe). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 625 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon E8870PCIe
G3D Mark Score
7,869+134%
3,368
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896+40%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+273%
0.8 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+166%
625 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
56+40%
40
L1 Cache
896 KB+460%
160 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon E8870PCIe relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon E8870PCIe
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E8870PCIe has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon E8870PCIe
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 37W — a 67.9% difference. The Radeon E8870PCIe is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon E8870PCIe
TDP
75W
37W-51%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+15%
91.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon E8870PCIe launched at $250. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 40.4% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 13.5 (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 291.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP
$149-40%
$250
Performance per Dollar
52.8+291%
13.5
Codename
TU117
Venus
Release
April 23 2019
January 25 2014
Ranking
#323
#734