GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 2400 XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 2400 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 2400 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅2222.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 3406% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Radeon HD 2400 XT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 185W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon HD 2400 XT

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌146.7% higher power demand at 185W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2222.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 6512.6% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 119), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3406% (52.8 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 2400 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 119 points. Launch price was $270.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 2400 XT's 119 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 6512.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 2400 XT uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.995 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 2400 XT
G3D Mark Score	7,869+6513%	119
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	1536+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	2.995 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+71%	975 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	96+71%
L1 Cache	896 KB+133%	384 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 2400 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 2400 XT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2400 XT carries 256 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2400 XT. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 2400 XT
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 2400 XT's 185W — a 84.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2400 XT). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 2400 XT
TDP	75W-59%	185W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+17383%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon HD 2400 XT launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon HD 2400 XT was 47% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3420% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP	$149	$79-47%
Performance per Dollar	52.8+3420%	1.5
Codename	TU117	Tahiti
Release	April 23 2019	November 19 2012
Ranking	#323	#469

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 2400 XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.