GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4290

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

GTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon HD 4290

2009Core: 850 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4290 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB 75

7,869

+5480.9%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Radeon HD 4290

0.5 GB 190

141

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅2335.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 2147.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Radeon HD 4290 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 190W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.

Radeon HD 4290

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌153.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2335.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5480.9% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 141), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $89 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $60, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2147.3% (52.8 vs 2.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 4290

The Radeon HD 4290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 141 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 4290's 141 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 5480.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 4290 uses TeraScale, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4290). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4290).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4290
G3D Mark Score	7,869+5481%	141
Architecture	Turing	TeraScale
Process Node	12 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	896+12%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+119%	1.36 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	896 KB+460%	160 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4290 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4290
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4290 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4290. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4290) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4290
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4290). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4290
DirectX	12+19%	10.1
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4290). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4290
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	UVD 2
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 4290's 190W — a 86.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4290). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4290
TDP	75W-61%	190W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+14886%	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon HD 4290 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4290 was 59.7% cheaper ($89 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 4290) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 4290
MSRP	$149	$60-60%
Performance per Dollar	52.8+2100%	2.4
Codename	TU117	RV790
Release	April 23 2019	April 2 2009
Ranking	#323	#762

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4290 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.