GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4770

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4770

2009Core: 750 MHz

Popular choices:

GTX 1650

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • +765.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 533.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 4770: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 4770 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 12.8% longer card at 229mm vs 203mm.

Radeon HD 4770

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $40 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Measures 203mm instead of 229mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (909 vs 7,869).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon HD 4770?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 909 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon HD 4770 is a 2009 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2009, 765.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 512 MB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1650 is about 36.7% more expensive on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and you are getting 765.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 4770 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon HD 4770 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon HD 4770 is 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 909 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
1080p
low94 FPS18 FPS
medium83 FPS10 FPS
high70 FPS6 FPS
ultra58 FPS3 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS11 FPS
medium74 FPS6 FPS
high60 FPS3 FPS
ultra50 FPS1 FPS
4K
low41 FPS4 FPS
medium39 FPS2 FPS
high27 FPS1 FPS
ultra24 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
1080p
low136 FPS39 FPS
medium113 FPS20 FPS
high94 FPS14 FPS
ultra71 FPS10 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS12 FPS
medium62 FPS6 FPS
high44 FPS5 FPS
ultra35 FPS4 FPS
4K
low36 FPS3 FPS
medium27 FPS2 FPS
high21 FPS2 FPS
ultra15 FPS1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
1080p
low323 FPS41 FPS
medium283 FPS33 FPS
high205 FPS27 FPS
ultra169 FPS20 FPS
1440p
low225 FPS31 FPS
medium202 FPS25 FPS
high151 FPS20 FPS
ultra117 FPS15 FPS
4K
low130 FPS20 FPS
medium117 FPS16 FPS
high79 FPS14 FPS
ultra50 FPS10 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
1080p
low261 FPS41 FPS
medium211 FPS33 FPS
high191 FPS27 FPS
ultra166 FPS20 FPS
1440p
low201 FPS27 FPS
medium158 FPS20 FPS
high135 FPS15 FPS
ultra113 FPS11 FPS
4K
low99 FPS16 FPS
medium74 FPS12 FPS
high65 FPS9 FPS
ultra51 FPS6 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 4770

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon HD 4770

The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 4770's 909 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 765.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 4770 uses TeraScale, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4770). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.96 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4770).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
G3D Mark Score
7,869+766%
909
Architecture
Turing
TeraScale
Process Node
12 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
896+40%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+211%
0.96 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
56+75%
32
L1 Cache
896 KB+600%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+669%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 4770 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4770 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon HD 4770) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+669%
0.13 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4770). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
DirectX
12+19%
10.1
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4770).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 4770's 80W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 400W (Radeon HD 4770). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 203mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
TDP
75W-6%
80W
Recommended PSU
300W-25%
400W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
229mm
203mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-3%
72°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+820%
11.4
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 4770 launched at $109. The Radeon HD 4770 costs 26.8% less ($40 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 536.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
MSRP
$149
$109-27%
Performance per Dollar
52.8+536%
8.3
Codename
TU117
RV740
Release
April 23 2019
April 28 2009
Ranking
#323
#908