Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4770

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4770

2009Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4770 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+765.7%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Radeon HD 4770
0.5 GB 80
909
0.0%
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 5730
brand logoRadeon HD 7570
brand logoRadeon HD 6550A
brand logoRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
brand logoRadeon R9 280
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low94 FPS
medium83 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra58 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 4770
low18 FPS
medium10 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low136 FPS
medium113 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra71 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 4770
low37 FPS
medium19 FPS
high14 FPS
ultra10 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low323 FPS
medium283 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra169 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 4770
low41 FPS
medium33 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra20 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low261 FPS
medium211 FPS
high191 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 4770
low41 FPS
medium33 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra20 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 4770
low41 FPS
medium33 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra20 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low166 FPS
medium154 FPS
high145 FPS
ultra119 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 4770
low7 FPS
medium4 FPS
high2 FPS
ultra2 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low77 FPS
medium59 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra34 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 4770
low7 FPS
medium5 FPS
high3 FPS
ultra2 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low59 FPS
medium41 FPS
high34 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 4770
low27 FPS
medium17 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low79 FPS
medium62 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra36 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 4770
low41 FPS
medium33 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra18 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low75 FPS
medium59 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra35 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 4770
low6 FPS
medium4 FPS
high3 FPS
ultra2 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅615.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Delivers 533.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
  • ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅Radeon HD 4770 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌12.8% longer card at 229mm vs 203mm.

Radeon HD 4770

2009

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Measures 203mm instead of 229mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 615.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 765.7% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 909), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $109, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 533.3% (52.8 vs 8.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 4770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon HD 4770

The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 4770's 909 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 765.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 4770 uses TeraScale, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4770). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.96 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4770).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
G3D Mark Score
7,869+766%
909
Architecture
Turing
TeraScale
Process Node
12 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
896+40%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+211%
0.96 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
56+75%
32
L1 Cache
896 KB+600%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+669%
0.13 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4770 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4770 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4770. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon HD 4770) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+669%
0.13 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4770). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
DirectX
12+19%
10.1
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4770).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
—
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 4770's 80W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 400W (Radeon HD 4770). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 203mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
TDP
75W-6%
80W
Recommended PSU
300W-25%
400W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
229mm
203mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-3%
72°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+820%
11.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon HD 4770 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4770 was 26.8% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 536.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 4770
MSRP
$149
$109-27%
Performance per Dollar
52.8+536%
8.3
Codename
TU117
RV740
Release
April 23 2019
April 28 2009
Ranking
#323
#908
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch Radeon HD 4770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.