GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 5570

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5570

2009Core: 725 MHz

Popular choices:

GTX 1650

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • +1553.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 787.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 5570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 5570 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
  • Draws 75W instead of 294W, a 219W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Radeon HD 5570

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $69 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (476 vs 7,869).
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 292% higher power demand at 294W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon HD 5570?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 476 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon HD 5570 is a 2009 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2009, 1553.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1650 is about 86.3% more expensive on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and you are getting 1553.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 5570 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon HD 5570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon HD 5570 is 2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 476 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5570
1080p
low94 FPS21 FPS
medium83 FPS17 FPS
high70 FPS14 FPS
ultra58 FPS11 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS16 FPS
medium74 FPS13 FPS
high60 FPS11 FPS
ultra50 FPS8 FPS
4K
low41 FPS11 FPS
medium39 FPS9 FPS
high27 FPS7 FPS
ultra24 FPS5 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5570
1080p
low136 FPS21 FPS
medium113 FPS17 FPS
high94 FPS14 FPS
ultra71 FPS11 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS16 FPS
medium62 FPS13 FPS
high44 FPS11 FPS
ultra35 FPS8 FPS
4K
low36 FPS11 FPS
medium27 FPS9 FPS
high21 FPS7 FPS
ultra15 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5570
1080p
low323 FPS21 FPS
medium283 FPS17 FPS
high205 FPS14 FPS
ultra169 FPS11 FPS
1440p
low225 FPS16 FPS
medium202 FPS13 FPS
high151 FPS11 FPS
ultra117 FPS8 FPS
4K
low130 FPS11 FPS
medium117 FPS9 FPS
high79 FPS7 FPS
ultra50 FPS5 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5570
1080p
low261 FPS21 FPS
medium211 FPS17 FPS
high191 FPS14 FPS
ultra166 FPS11 FPS
1440p
low201 FPS16 FPS
medium158 FPS13 FPS
high135 FPS11 FPS
ultra113 FPS8 FPS
4K
low99 FPS11 FPS
medium74 FPS9 FPS
high65 FPS7 FPS
ultra51 FPS5 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 5570

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon HD 5570

The Radeon HD 5570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 476 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 5570's 476 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1553.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 5570 uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5570). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5570).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5570
G3D Mark Score
7,869+1553%
476
Architecture
Turing
TeraScale 2
Process Node
12 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
896
1600 ×2+79%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+29%
2.32 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
32
32 ×2
TMUs
56
80 ×2+43%
L1 Cache
896 KB+180%
320 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 5570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5570
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5570 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5570) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5570
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 5570). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5570
DirectX
12+7%
11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.4
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (Radeon HD 5570). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5570).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5570
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
None
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 5570's 294W — a 118.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 250W (Radeon HD 5570). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5570
TDP
75W-74%
294W
Recommended PSU
300W
250W-17%
Power Connector
None
None
Length
229mm
168mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
70
Perf/Watt
104.9+6456%
1.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 5570 launched at $80. The Radeon HD 5570 costs 46.3% less ($69 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.0 (Radeon HD 5570) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 780% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 5570
MSRP
$149
$80-46%
Performance per Dollar
52.8+780%
6.0
Codename
TU117
Hemlock
Release
April 23 2019
November 18 2009
Ranking
#323
#651