Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 7400G

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7400G

2025Core: 1452 MHzBoost: 2300 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 7400G Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+2847.2%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Radeon HD 7400G
0.5 GB 43
267
0.0%
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 4350
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 530v
brand logoRadeon HD 4650 AGP
brand logoRadeon HD 6410D
brand logoRadeon HD 7970M Crossfire
brand logoRadeon RX 6550M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 7400G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low94 FPS
medium83 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra58 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 7400G
low12 FPS
medium10 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra6 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low136 FPS
medium113 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra71 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 7400G
low12 FPS
medium10 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra6 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low323 FPS
medium283 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra169 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 7400G
low12 FPS
medium10 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra6 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low261 FPS
medium211 FPS
high191 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 7400G
low12 FPS
medium10 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra6 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 7400G
low12 FPS
medium10 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra6 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low166 FPS
medium154 FPS
high145 FPS
ultra119 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 7400G
low12 FPS
medium10 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra6 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low77 FPS
medium59 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra34 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 7400G
low12 FPS
medium10 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra6 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low59 FPS
medium41 FPS
high34 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 7400G
low12 FPS
medium10 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra6 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low79 FPS
medium62 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra36 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 7400G
low12 FPS
medium10 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra6 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low75 FPS
medium59 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra35 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 7400G
low12 FPS
medium10 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra6 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 7400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅1061.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Delivers 889% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌74.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 43W.

Radeon HD 7400G

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • ✅Draws 43W instead of 75W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1061.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2847.2% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 267), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7400G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 889% (52.8 vs 5.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 7400G has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 7400G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon HD 7400G

The Radeon HD 7400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 267 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 7400G's 267 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2847.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 7400G uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7400G). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7400G). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2300 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 7400G
G3D Mark Score
7,869+2847%
267
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
896
1792+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
16.49 TFLOPS+453%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2300 MHz+38%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
56
112+100%
L1 Cache
896 KB+75%
512 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7400G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 7400G
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7400G carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7400G. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon HD 7400G) — the Radeon HD 7400G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 7400G
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7400G). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 7400G
DirectX
12+7%
11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.4
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (Radeon HD 7400G). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 7400G).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 7400G
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
None
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7400G's 43W — a 54.2% difference. The Radeon HD 7400G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7400G). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 7400G
TDP
75W
43W-43%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
229mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75
Perf/Watt
104.9+1592%
6.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon HD 7400G launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7400G was 66.4% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.3 (Radeon HD 7400G) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 896.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7400G (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD 7400G
MSRP
$149
$50-66%
Performance per Dollar
52.8+896%
5.3
Codename
TU117
Navi 33
Release
April 23 2019
August 8 2025
Ranking
#323
#229
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch Radeon HD 7400G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.