
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+57.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
2012Why buy it
- ✅+57.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire's 5,000 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 57.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire uses GCN, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,560 (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+57% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2560+186% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s x2+20% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit x2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+320% | 25.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | Wimbledon XT |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #323 | #395 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













