
GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon HD 8310E
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 8310E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 8310E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 8310E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅831.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 674.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Radeon HD 8310E is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon HD 8310E
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 8310E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 8310E
The Radeon HD 8310E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 8310E's 341 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2207.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 8310E uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 8310E). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8310E).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 8310E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+2208% | 341 |
| Architecture | Turing | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1120+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+67% | 1.792 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+700% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8310E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 8310E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8310E carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8310E. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8310E) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 8310E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8310E's 175W — a 80% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8310E). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 8310E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-57% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+5421% | 1.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon HD 8310E launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8310E was 66.4% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.8 (Radeon HD 8310E) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 676.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon HD 8310E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $50-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+676% | 6.8 |
| Codename | TU117 | Cypress |
| Release | April 23 2019 | February 25 2010 |
| Ranking | #323 | #724 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















