G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+648% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 8750M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 8750M is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8750M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,052 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon HD 8750M

2013

Why buy it

✅+648% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 8750M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 8750M is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,052 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon HD 8750M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 1,052 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon HD 8750M is a 2013 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013, 648.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $149 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 648.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon HD 8750M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon HD 8750M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 8750M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8750M
1080p
low	94 FPS	15 FPS
medium	83 FPS	9 FPS
high	70 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	3 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	9 FPS
medium	74 FPS	5 FPS
high	60 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	4 FPS
medium	39 FPS	2 FPS
high	27 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon HD 8750M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8750M
1080p
low	136 FPS	47 FPS
medium	113 FPS	38 FPS
high	94 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	36 FPS
medium	62 FPS	27 FPS
high	44 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	16 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	24 FPS
medium	27 FPS	15 FPS
high	21 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	8 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon HD 8750M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8750M
1080p
low	323 FPS	47 FPS
medium	283 FPS	38 FPS
high	205 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	36 FPS
medium	202 FPS	28 FPS
high	151 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	18 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	24 FPS
medium	117 FPS	19 FPS
high	79 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon HD 8750M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8750M
1080p
low	261 FPS	47 FPS
medium	211 FPS	38 FPS
high	191 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	17 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	6 FPS
medium	158 FPS	5 FPS
high	135 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	2 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	4 FPS
medium	74 FPS	3 FPS
high	65 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon HD 8750M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 8750M

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 8750M

The Radeon HD 8750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 26 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 670 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 8750M's 1,052 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 648%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 8750M uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8750M). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5146 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8750M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 775 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8750M
G3D Mark Score	7,869+648%	1,052
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+480%	0.5146 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+115%	775 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	896 KB+833%	96 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 8750M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8750M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8750M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8750M) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8750M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8750M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8750M
DirectX	12	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8750M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 8750M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8750M
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8750M's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8750M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8750M
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+400%	21.0