GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD4650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD4650

2010Boost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD4650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD4650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 1293.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 1000.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Radeon HD4650 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 18.7% longer card at 229mm vs 193mm.

Radeon HD4650

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $99 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Measures 193mm instead of 229mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1293.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3178.8% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 240), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1000.3% (52.8 vs 4.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD4650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon HD4650

The Radeon HD4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 240 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD4650's 240 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 3178.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD4650 uses TeraScale 3, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD4650). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4650). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 800 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD4650
G3D Mark Score
7,869+3179%
240
Architecture
Turing
TeraScale 3
Process Node
12 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
896
1408+57%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+32%
2.253 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+108%
800 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
88+57%
L1 Cache
896 KB+155%
352 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD4650 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD4650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD4650 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD4650. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD4650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD4650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD4650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD4650
DirectX
12+19%
10.1
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD4650). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 2.2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD4650
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
UVD 2.2
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD4650's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon HD4650). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 193mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD4650
TDP
75W-63%
200W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
193mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+8642%
1.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Radeon HD4650 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD4650 was 66.4% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.8 (Radeon HD4650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1000% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon HD4650
MSRP
$149
$50-66%
Performance per Dollar
52.8+1000%
4.8
Codename
TU117
Cayman
Release
April 23 2019
December 14 2010
Ranking
#323
#623

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.