GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON HD6410D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+1760.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 337% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

RADEON HD6410D

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (423 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

RADEON HD6410D

2023

Why buy it

✅+1760.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 337% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (423 vs 7,869).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than RADEON HD6410D?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 423 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while RADEON HD6410D is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON HD6410D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about 325.7% more expensive on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $35 MSRP, and you are getting 1760.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 337%. RADEON HD6410D is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 75W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RADEON HD6410D make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. RADEON HD6410D is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 75W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $35 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1650. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1650 currently gives you 1760.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 337%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RADEON HD6410D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6410D
1080p
low	94 FPS	19 FPS
medium	83 FPS	15 FPS
high	70 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	8 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	14 FPS
medium	74 FPS	11 FPS
high	60 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	9 FPS
medium	39 FPS	6 FPS
high	27 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RADEON HD6410D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6410D
1080p
low	136 FPS	19 FPS
medium	113 FPS	13 FPS
high	94 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	7 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	9 FPS
medium	62 FPS	4 FPS
high	44 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	3 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	3 FPS
medium	27 FPS	2 FPS
high	21 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RADEON HD6410D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6410D
1080p
low	323 FPS	19 FPS
medium	283 FPS	15 FPS
high	205 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	14 FPS
medium	202 FPS	11 FPS
high	151 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	10 FPS
medium	117 FPS	8 FPS
high	79 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RADEON HD6410D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6410D
1080p
low	261 FPS	19 FPS
medium	211 FPS	15 FPS
high	191 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	9 FPS
medium	158 FPS	7 FPS
high	135 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	7 FPS
medium	74 FPS	5 FPS
high	65 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open RADEON HD6410D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RADEON HD6410D

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RADEON HD6410D's 423 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1760.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6410D
G3D Mark Score	7,869+1760%	423
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896+600%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+430%	0.5632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2200 MHz+32%
ROPs	32+700%	4
TMUs	56+600%	8
L1 Cache	896 KB+2700%	32 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RADEON HD6410D relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6410D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6410D has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6410D
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON HD6410D
TDP	75W	15W-80%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+272%	28.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the RADEON HD6410D launched at $35. The RADEON HD6410D costs 76.5% less ($114 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (RADEON HD6410D) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 336.4% better value. The RADEON HD6410D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).