Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON HD7450

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

RADEON HD7450

2012Boost: 1250 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON HD7450 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB 75
7,869
+3854.3%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
RADEON HD7450
0.5 GB 200
199
0.0%
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON X1800
brand logoRadeon HD 7340
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 530v
brand logoRadeon R9 M395
brand logoRadeon RX 6500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON HD7450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low94 FPS
medium83 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra58 FPS
1080P
RADEON HD7450
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low136 FPS
medium113 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra71 FPS
1080P
RADEON HD7450
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low323 FPS
medium283 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra169 FPS
1080P
RADEON HD7450
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low261 FPS
medium211 FPS
high191 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
RADEON HD7450
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
RADEON HD7450
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low166 FPS
medium154 FPS
high145 FPS
ultra119 FPS
1080P
RADEON HD7450
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low77 FPS
medium59 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra34 FPS
1080P
RADEON HD7450
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low59 FPS
medium41 FPS
high34 FPS
ultra25 FPS
1080P
RADEON HD7450
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low79 FPS
medium62 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra36 FPS
1080P
RADEON HD7450
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 1650
low75 FPS
medium59 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra35 FPS
1080P
RADEON HD7450
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON HD7450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅1641.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Delivers 1226.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 4.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅RADEON HD7450 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

RADEON HD7450

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1641.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3854.3% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 199), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1226.9% (52.8 vs 4.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON HD7450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

RADEON HD7450

The RADEON HD7450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 199 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RADEON HD7450's 199 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 3854.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RADEON HD7450 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,792 (RADEON HD7450). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (RADEON HD7450). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON HD7450
G3D Mark Score
7,869+3854%
199
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896
1792+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+4%
2.867 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+33%
1250 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
112+100%
L1 Cache
896 KB+100%
448 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON HD7450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON HD7450
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD7450 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD7450. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.75 MB (RADEON HD7450) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON HD7450
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.2 (RADEON HD7450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON HD7450
DirectX
12+7%
11.2
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 1.0 (RADEON HD7450). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON HD7450
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RADEON HD7450's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RADEON HD7450). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON HD7450
TDP
75W-63%
200W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Length
229mm
168mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
—
Perf/Watt
104.9+10390%
1.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the RADEON HD7450 launched at $50. On MSRP, RADEON HD7450 was 66.4% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.0 (RADEON HD7450) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1220% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650RADEON HD7450
MSRP
$149
$50-66%
Performance per Dollar
52.8+1220%
4.0
Codename
TU117
Tahiti
Release
April 23 2019
January 31 2012
Ranking
#323
#454
Search GeForce GTX 1650 on AmazonSearch RADEON HD7450 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.